Today 4

Kering resets for growth: cut stores, de-risk Gucci, redeploy capital

Bottom Line Impact

Kering is accepting a controlled near-term sales dip to structurally lift productivity and margins, reduce Gucci dependency, and rebuild multi-brand momentum, positioning the group as a more resilient challenger with stronger brand equity over the next 12-36 months.

Key Roles Affected

CEOCFOCOOCMO

Executive Summary

Kering is executing a deliberate reset to reduce Gucci concentration, streamline its retail footprint, and recalibrate pricing after divesting beauty for balance-sheet firepower. The plan targets a return to growth within 18 months and top-tier financial performance in three years, trading near-term revenue pressure for improved capital allocation and portfolio resilience.

Actionable Insights

Immediate Actions (Next 30-90 days)
Set and disclose a Gucci concentration cap of 40-45 percent of group revenue by FY27 with brand-level growth targets for Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, and Balenciaga
Rationale: A clear cap reduces key-brand concentration risk, aligns capital allocation, and provides investors with measurable de-risking milestones
Role affected:CEO
Urgency level:immediate
Rebuild the price architecture with a 5-10 percent recalibration on entry categories in key regions and stricter distribution of icons to lift full-price sell-through by 300-500 bps
Rationale: Re-establishing price ladders and scarcity restores brand heat without broad discounting
Role affected:CMO
Urgency level:immediate
Short-term Actions (6-12 months)
Allocate beauty proceeds with a 40-50 percent deleveraging tranche, 30-40 percent strategic capex for store upgrades and hero product capacity, and 10-20 percent for selective M and A in hard luxury supply or craftsmanship
Rationale: Balanced deployment stabilizes the balance sheet while funding growth engines and margin-accretive capabilities
Role affected:CFO
Urgency level:short-term
Implement a store productivity threshold and exit plan targeting the bottom 15-20 percent of doors by sales per sqm and EBIT contribution, aiming for 10-15 percent uplift in sales per store within 12 months
Rationale: Pruning low-yield doors increases productivity, reduces fixed costs, and directs traffic to higher-impact flagships
Role affected:COO
Urgency level:short-term

Strategic Analysis

Next 30-90 days will center on a portfolio and network triage, pricing and assortment audits, and working-capital normalization. Expect a freeze on new store openings, selective closures pipelineed, tighter open-to-buy, and early price harmonization tests in the US, China, and Europe to protect full-price sell-through.

Over 6-12 months, revenue may contract 2-4 percent from closures and price resets, but store productivity and gross margin should improve as low-productivity doors exit and discount dependency eases. Gucci mix is likely to trend lower toward sub-50 percent of group sales in 18-24 months as Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta, and Balenciaga scale, with jewelry pursuing shared services and joint sourcing to lift profitability.

Kering is positioning as the disciplined challenger versus LVMH and Richemont by trading breadth for productivity and focus. A leaner retail base and clearer price architecture can sharpen brand codes and reduce promotional leakage, but competitive intensity in leather goods and hard luxury will rise as peers use scale to defend traffic and retain top artisans.

Suppliers face volume consolidation toward tier-one ateliers and tanneries with higher compliance and capacity standards, while secondary partners risk reduced orders. Landlords should expect renegotiations or exits on sub-scale locations; wholesale partners may see tighter allocations. Clients will encounter fewer doors, more curated assortments, and clearer price ladders, with enhanced services concentrated in flagship nodes.

Risks & Opportunities

Primary Risks

  • Short-term revenue softness from accelerated closures and price recalibration could pressure 2025 top line
  • Further dilution of Gucci brand heat if assortment transition and creative cadence misalign with client expectations
  • Execution risk in jewelry where scale disadvantages versus peers may persist despite synergies

Primary Opportunities

  • Portfolio rebalance toward multiple growth engines reduces volatility and supports a more resilient earnings base
  • Store network optimization and tighter pricing can add 50-150 bps to operating margin over 12-24 months
  • Shared services and joint sourcing in jewelry and leather can unlock €50-150m annual run-rate efficiencies by FY27

Market Context

The reset aligns with a luxury market recalibration marked by softer aspirational demand in the US, uneven China recovery, and consumer pushback after multi-year price inflation. Competitors LVMH and Richemont leverage scale in hard luxury and supply-chain depth; Kering can differentiate via sharper brand focus, curated distribution, and capital discipline. Gen-Z and young HENRYs skew toward quiet luxury and experiential value, favoring fewer but better doors, tight icons management, and omnichannel service consistency.

Back to Gucci All Companies