Today 4

Richemont faces ISS revolt: governance and pay under scrutiny pre-AGM

Bottom Line Impact

Governance pressure around voting rights and pay transparency threatens a near-term valuation overhang, but targeted reforms can compress Richemont's discount, lower cost of capital, and reinforce brand equity by signaling performance alignment without sacrificing strategic autonomy.

Executive Summary

ISS recommends voting against Richemont's chairman and a board member, and opposing CHF 30.6m executive bonuses, spotlighting the group's unequal voting structure ahead of the September AGM. This elevates near-term governance risk, potentially widening Richemont's valuation discount versus peers unless the board commits to clearer remuneration targets and governance enhancements.

Actionable Insights

Immediate Actions (Next 30-90 days)
Announce before AGM a governance enhancement package including pay KPI disclosure, an annual non-binding vote on remuneration policy, and a timeline to add at least one new independent director with deep digital and Asia expertise within 6 months
Rationale: Directly addresses ISS concerns, improves investor confidence, and preserves strategic control while signaling accountability
Role affected:Chairman and Lead Independent Director
Urgency level:immediate
Publish a detailed variable compensation scorecard with 3 to 5 quantifiable KPIs for FY25, including EBIT margin expansion, inventory turns, client retention, and DTC e-commerce growth, with target and achieved ranges
Rationale: Transparency on pay-for-performance is the decisive lever to flip proxy advisor recommendations for compensation items
Role affected:CFO
Urgency level:immediate
Short-term Actions (6-12 months)
Run a focused investor outreach to top 20 shareholders and governance-focused funds within 2 to 3 weeks, offering commitments on compensation disclosure and a mid-term review of voting rights structure
Rationale: Secures swing votes and reduces withhold risk on director elections and remuneration items
Role affected:CEO
Urgency level:short-term
Accelerate high-ROI clienteling and VIC activation to deliver a visible Q3 sales and margin print, offsetting governance noise
Rationale: Operational outperformance can temper governance discount and support narrative of performance alignment
Role affected:CMO and Maison CEOs
Urgency level:short-term

Strategic Analysis

Next 30 to 90 days will see elevated proxy engagement needs, potential negative headlines, and increased vote risk on chair re-election and the remuneration agenda. Expect 2 to 4 percent share price volatility into the AGM and a potential uptick in withhold votes unless the board discloses clearer KPI frameworks for variable pay and signals a governance roadmap.

Over 6 to 12 months, failure to address governance concerns could sustain a 5 to 10 percent governance discount to best-in-class peers and limit index inclusion by ESG funds, slightly lifting cost of equity by 30 to 70 bps. Conversely, targeted reforms and pay transparency could broaden the investor base, compress the discount, and improve optionality for portfolio moves and JV partnerships.

Peers with strong governance signaling such as LVMH and Hermes typically command higher multiples; Richemont's perceived control imbalance may impede relative rerating despite jewelry leadership. Kering and Swatch face their own execution issues, creating an opening for Richemont to differentiate via governance enhancements without diluting strategic control.

Vendors and retail partners watch governance for continuity risk; heightened uncertainty can slow joint marketing commitments in the near term. Clear compensation KPIs tied to clienteling, service quality, and omnichannel conversion would cascade performance discipline through maisons, supporting supplier stability and frontline engagement.

Risks & Opportunities

Primary Risks

  • Say-on-pay or remuneration items receive less than 70 percent support, triggering negative governance signals and media scrutiny
  • High withhold votes against chair and family-affiliated director increase perceived key-man and control risk, elevating cost of equity by 30 to 70 bps
  • ESG rating downgrades and index exclusion reduce access to governance-sensitive capital

Primary Opportunities

  • Pre-emptive disclosure and board refresh narrow valuation discount by 5 to 10 percent over 6 to 12 months
  • Broader investor base from governance-focused funds enhances liquidity and lowers equity risk premium
  • Clear KPI alignment improves maison-level execution and supports margin expansion of 50 to 100 bps

Market Context

With China demand normalizing and US aspirational spend softening, investors are more sensitive to governance and cash discipline as multiple expansion becomes harder to earn. Richemont's jewelry leadership and net cash position are strategic strengths, but a dual-class perception gap versus peers with stronger governance signaling can cap rerating. Delivering above-peer execution while addressing compensation transparency positions Richemont to capture quality-seeking capital amid ongoing sector rotation toward resilient, high-ROIC houses.

Back to Richemont All Companies