Armani's sale will be priced on the durability of ~€200m+ royalty EBITDA and the buyer's ability to lift low-margin core fashion, with L’Oréal and EssilorLuxottica structurally advantaged and LVMH competitive if it secures credible economic access to beauty, shaping revenue growth, margin trajectory, and brand equity over the next 12-24 months.
Armani's true commercial footprint approaches €4.25bn when licensed beauty and eyewear are included, versus €2.3bn core fashion revenue that fell 5% and delivered just a 3% operating margin. With the founder's will naming LVMH, L’Oréal, and EssilorLuxottica as preferred buyers and prescribing an initial 15% stake then a larger transfer or listing, control economics will hinge on preserving or reshaping long-dated licenses that generate high-margin cash flows.
Over the next 30-90 days, LVMH (MC), L’Oréal, and EssilorLuxottica (EL) will intensify diligence on license economics, change-of-control clauses, and governance of a staged acquisition. Expect term-sheet discussions around a 15% minority entry, valuation frameworks that capitalize ~€200m+ of royalty EBITDA, and proposals to safeguard brand stewardship post-founder.
Luxury apparel faces softness in formalwear while beauty and eyewear remain resilient; China demand is uneven with prestige beauty outperforming soft luxury. Integrated owners are internalizing licenses to capture margin, yet Armani's long-dated agreements invert the usual playbook, advantaging incumbents (L’Oréal, EL) over conglomerates seeking full-stack control. Against peers, LVMH retains balance-sheet firepower but must navigate externalized beauty; EL's eyewear scale and DTC give defensibility; a successful transaction could pressure Kering and Richemont to accelerate brand acquisitions or deepen beauty strategies.