Today 4

Lanvin Group CFO exit elevates execution risk in liquidity reset

Bottom Line Impact

Short-term leadership and liquidity risks may dampen sales and margins, but decisive portfolio pruning, tighter working capital, and a credible CFO appointment can restore positive cash flow and stabilize brand equity within 12 months.

Key Roles Affected

CEOCFOCOOCMO

Executive Summary

Lanvin Group’s executive chairman and CFO, David Chan, exits on Oct 27 amid a portfolio restructuring and asset disposals to shore up liquidity, following a 22% YoY revenue decline in H1. Leadership transition during an active divestment cycle raises short-term execution risk and vendor uncertainty but creates a window to sharpen brand focus, stabilize cash, and rebuild investor confidence.

Actionable Insights

Immediate Actions (Next 30-90 days)
Name an empowered interim CFO and announce a 90-day stabilization plan with weekly cash disclosure and a firm timeline (≤45 days) to appoint a permanent CFO.
Rationale: Reduces counterparty risk perception, keeps asset-sale processes on track, and steadies investor sentiment during transition.
Role affected:CEO
Urgency level:immediate
Secure 12–18 months of liquidity runway (committed facility or ABL), target 12–15% inventory reduction, extend DPO by 7–10 days, and accelerate sale-leaseback/signing for non-core real estate with closings in 60–90 days.
Rationale: Releases 100–150 bps of net working capital, cushions timing risk on disposals, and signals financial control to vendors and markets.
Role affected:CFO
Urgency level:immediate
Short-term Actions (6-12 months)
Cut low-velocity SKUs by 20–30%, renegotiate MOQs/lead times, and shift 10–15% of production to faster-turn suppliers; implement S&OP cadence tied to weekly sell-through.
Rationale: Aligns inventory to demand, lowers markdown risk, and improves cash conversion during sales softness.
Role affected:COO
Urgency level:short-term
Reallocate 15–20% of awareness spend to CRM/retention and hero-product storytelling; cap markdown-driven sales to <18% of revenue and enforce floor pricing across wholesale.
Rationale: Protects brand equity and gross margin while driving near-term conversion from existing clients.
Role affected:CMO
Urgency level:short-term

Strategic Analysis

Next 30–90 days: Elevated vendor and lender caution likely; expect tighter supplier terms (10–15 days reduction in DPO) and potential wholesale order deferrals pending clarity on leadership and financing. Deal execution risk for asset sales increases (closing slippage 4–8 weeks). Investor relations requires proactive guidance to mitigate share volatility.

6–12 months: If portfolio pruning and asset disposals close by Q2–Q3 2025, operating margin could expand by 200–300 bps via lower fixed cost base and tighter SKU focus; DTC mix uplift of 5–7 pp and 8–12% fixed-cost reduction feasible with store rationalization and supply-chain resets. Failure to close disposals or to appoint a high-credibility CFO within 45–60 days risks prolonged discounting and market-share erosion.

Market polarization favors mega-houses; sub-scale groups must sharpen positioning around hero categories and disciplined distribution. A timely refocus could reposition the group as a curated portfolio of maisons competing on craftsmanship niches; delays open shelf-space and mind-share to LVMH/Prada/Kering and strong independents.

Suppliers may request deposits or LC-backed orders, pressuring working capital; wholesale partners can cut SS25/FW25 orders by 10–20% until roadmap clarity. Landlords are likely to negotiate shorter leases and variable rent; marketplaces may demand higher marketing co-op. Consumers may face tighter assortments; risk of elevated markdowns if inventory is not aligned.

Risks & Opportunities

Primary Risks

  • Liquidity timing gap if asset sales slip, forcing costly financing or deeper discounting.
  • Talent flight and decision bottlenecks in finance/merchandising during leadership transition.
  • Wholesale orderbook contraction (SS25/FW25) and vendor term tightening, stressing working capital.

Primary Opportunities

  • Portfolio rationalization to concentrate investment behind 2–3 scalable maisons and exit sub-scale assets.
  • Real estate monetization via sale-leasebacks to fund brand-building and digital acceleration without equity dilution.
  • Governance reset (new CFO, KPI transparency) to rebuild investor trust and lower cost of capital.

Market Context

Luxury demand remains uneven: China’s recovery is patchy, US aspirational spending is softer, and Europe is tourist-dependent; Middle East remains relatively resilient. Market share is consolidating to mega-brands with pricing power, while second-tier groups face higher promo pressure and wholesale volatility. In this environment, smaller portfolios must simplify, prioritize DTC and hero products, and protect GM by pulling back on marginal doors and undifferentiated SKUs—similar to resets underway at other challenged houses.

Back to Lanvin All Companies